The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
Using WEKA learner
chenUser4321
Member Posts: 11 Contributor II
Hi:
When using WEKA learner in RM 4.6, I notice that I may need to define a system property named rapidminer.weka.jar according to this link http://rapid-i.com/wiki/index.php?title=Integrating_RapidMiner_into_your_application#RapidMiner_as_a_library][url]http://rapid-i.com/wiki/index.php?title=Integrating_RapidMiner_into_your_application#RapidMiner_as_a_library.
This allows RM to know where the weka jar file is.
I am using eclipse to do the development, and I have tried to define this rapidminer.weka.jar as an environment variable in run configuration. But rapidminer still cannot find the weka jar file when doing initialization (RapidMiner.init()).
So how should this system property be defined? Any suggestion is appreciated!
When using WEKA learner in RM 4.6, I notice that I may need to define a system property named rapidminer.weka.jar according to this link http://rapid-i.com/wiki/index.php?title=Integrating_RapidMiner_into_your_application#RapidMiner_as_a_library][url]http://rapid-i.com/wiki/index.php?title=Integrating_RapidMiner_into_your_application#RapidMiner_as_a_library.
This allows RM to know where the weka jar file is.
I am using eclipse to do the development, and I have tried to define this rapidminer.weka.jar as an environment variable in run configuration. But rapidminer still cannot find the weka jar file when doing initialization (RapidMiner.init()).
So how should this system property be defined? Any suggestion is appreciated!
Tagged:
0
Answers
in RM 5.0 this is no longer necessary.
I don't remember 4.6 well, but I don't think you ever had to define environment variables at all. I would try defining a system property instead.
Best,
Simon