The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
"RapidMiner Association Rules / transaction based dataset"
Hello,
maybe someone here has already had experiences with this topic. I have itemsets that represent orders. The format is:
OrderID Item
1234 10
1234 12
1267 3
1288 3
My problem is, that the nominal-2-binominal operator doesn`t support this format. Using this Operator, it creates binominal datalines for each row. What i need is a grouping by the corresponding OrderID.
I spend a lot of time for finding a solution but i didn`t get any answers yet - although it seem to represent a common data-format.
Thanks for youre help !
maybe someone here has already had experiences with this topic. I have itemsets that represent orders. The format is:
OrderID Item
1234 10
1234 12
1267 3
1288 3
My problem is, that the nominal-2-binominal operator doesn`t support this format. Using this Operator, it creates binominal datalines for each row. What i need is a grouping by the corresponding OrderID.
I spend a lot of time for finding a solution but i didn`t get any answers yet - although it seem to represent a common data-format.
Thanks for youre help !
Tagged:
0
Answers
I'm not sure what your desired output is. This?
OrderID Item
1234 10, 12
1267 3
1288 3
Something else?
Regards,
Marco
OrderID Item_10 Item_12 Item_3
1234 true true false
1267 false false true
1288 false false true
I want to search for association rules in the item sets. Therefore i have to use the FP-Growth Operator.
Thanks for your'e reply
http://rapid-i.com/rapidforum/index.php/topic,1821.msg7227.html#msg7227
happy mining.
the questions is whether there is a simpler solution.
Thanks for youre reply. I already had a look on the mentioned topic.