The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
bars plotter
Dear All!
I have to evaluate two surveys which were conducted in 2006 and in 2011. All data (questions, answers, ...) is in MS Access. I want to use RapidMiner to e.g. compare the results graphically from 2006 and 2011.
Now, I have a result table as follows:
my question:
Is it possible to design the "Bars Plotter" in such a way that for one answer the number of answers from 2006 and 2011 appear next to each other and for the second answer in the same way?
In Excel, this is possible...
Thanks in advance!
currant
I have to evaluate two surveys which were conducted in 2006 and in 2011. All data (questions, answers, ...) is in MS Access. I want to use RapidMiner to e.g. compare the results graphically from 2006 and 2011.
Now, I have a result table as follows:
Answer Year Number of Answers |
answer1 2006 26 |
answer1 2011 55 |
answer2 2006 115 |
answer2 2011 134 |
Is it possible to design the "Bars Plotter" in such a way that for one answer the number of answers from 2006 and 2011 appear next to each other and for the second answer in the same way?
In Excel, this is possible...
Thanks in advance!
currant
0
Answers
As far as I know there is currently no plotter which does exactly what you described. But the Bars Stacked may also work for this kind of purpose. It just stacks the bars instead of lining them up. Just try it and select the following parameters:
Helge
Thanx a lot!
Do you know if this is possible with RapidAnalytics?
currant
this type of grouped bar chart is indeed possible with RapidAnalytics. Look at this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HnK777XAHI
In the lower left part of the style bundle definitions you can see the desired chart type if I am not mistaken.
Cheers,
Ingo