The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
Anova with Rapid Miner
Hello,
I try to make an gouped ANova with Rapid Miner.
I upload an excel file with the excel operator and I connect the output to the input of the grouped anova operator and... it failed...
I assume it might be because I don't make the configuration properly. In particular, I can't manage to set the metadata information on my excel file. I suppose I should state the first column as a polynomial attributes and the second column as a numerical regular data but I don't find the right way to do so...
Can someone help me?
Thanks,
Barthélémy
I try to make an gouped ANova with Rapid Miner.
I upload an excel file with the excel operator and I connect the output to the input of the grouped anova operator and... it failed...
I assume it might be because I don't make the configuration properly. In particular, I can't manage to set the metadata information on my excel file. I suppose I should state the first column as a polynomial attributes and the second column as a numerical regular data but I don't find the right way to do so...
Can someone help me?
Thanks,
Barthélémy
0
Answers
Have you tried to use the Import-Wizard (File -> Import Data -> Import Excel Sheet)? It offers you a variety of options to set attribute names, value types and roles for your excel data.
Cheers,
Helge
Perhaps it is not the right meta data.
To make it clear I have two columns, one that tells the condition ("Disciplines" which is declared as the "grouped by attribute" attribute) which is a string that I defined as a polynominal data and set to attribute and one that tells the score ("Ncompétences") which is an integer that I defined as a numerical value and also set to attribute...
Is there any mistake?
Thanks again,
Barthélémy
Thanks,
b