The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
"Factor Analysis vs PCA?"
NedPointsman
Member Posts: 2 Contributor I
I'm fairly new to this whole thing and I'm trying to get my head around component analysis.
Given a very basic data set of;
mode/displacement/cylinders/mpg
DB9 5.9 12.0 15.0
DBS 5.9 12.0 14.0
A3 2.0 4.0 24.0
A3 QUATTRO 2.0 4.0 24.0
A4 2.0 4.0 26.0
A6 3.2 6.0 22.0
Q5 3.2 6.0 20.0
A4 QUATTRO 2.0 4.0 23.0
A5 Cabriolet 2.0 4.0 26.0
Brooklands 6.8 8.0 11.0
...
What I want to know is the overall correlation between mpg and displacement. At first glance PCA appeared to be what I required, but looking into it, it seems using R and a straightforward factor analysis is the way to go?
Thanks in advance.
Given a very basic data set of;
mode/displacement/cylinders/mpg
DB9 5.9 12.0 15.0
DBS 5.9 12.0 14.0
A3 2.0 4.0 24.0
A3 QUATTRO 2.0 4.0 24.0
A4 2.0 4.0 26.0
A6 3.2 6.0 22.0
Q5 3.2 6.0 20.0
A4 QUATTRO 2.0 4.0 23.0
A5 Cabriolet 2.0 4.0 26.0
Brooklands 6.8 8.0 11.0
...
What I want to know is the overall correlation between mpg and displacement. At first glance PCA appeared to be what I required, but looking into it, it seems using R and a straightforward factor analysis is the way to go?
Thanks in advance.
0