The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
"Logistic Regression: Missing cut-off and intercept settings?"
Learner III
Hi all
I am posting this without an example because it holds for any application of the myKLR-based Logistic Regression operator, in my opinion.
I am aware of the fact that kernel logistic regression does not follow the usual maximum likelihood training approach of PASW, SAS, R, etc. Nevertheless, there appears to be a convention of what reviewers in many academic journals expect to see when Logistic Regression models are reported, and I am wondering how to obtain these results in RM. I am specifically not referring to any goodness-of-fit / pseudo R-squared values as I know these are not implemented on purpose. Specifically, I am interested in
- the cut-off value, which sets a threshold on confidence values to obtain class labels. I believe these are used to obtain the ROC curve in the performance operator, but I do not see how to set / read them.
- the intercept, or constant in the logistic regression equation. In my opinion, the intercept is a crucial parameter which largely determines the sample selection bias of a logistic regression classifier. For some applications it has to be fixed to zero.
Furthermore, many reviewers demand a forward / backward variable selection based on significance (p-values) and NOT based on overall model performance, and it would be helpful to know whether these (or a substitute) is obtainable in RM.
Thanks for any ideas / suggestions!
I am posting this without an example because it holds for any application of the myKLR-based Logistic Regression operator, in my opinion.
I am aware of the fact that kernel logistic regression does not follow the usual maximum likelihood training approach of PASW, SAS, R, etc. Nevertheless, there appears to be a convention of what reviewers in many academic journals expect to see when Logistic Regression models are reported, and I am wondering how to obtain these results in RM. I am specifically not referring to any goodness-of-fit / pseudo R-squared values as I know these are not implemented on purpose. Specifically, I am interested in
- the cut-off value, which sets a threshold on confidence values to obtain class labels. I believe these are used to obtain the ROC curve in the performance operator, but I do not see how to set / read them.
- the intercept, or constant in the logistic regression equation. In my opinion, the intercept is a crucial parameter which largely determines the sample selection bias of a logistic regression classifier. For some applications it has to be fixed to zero.
Furthermore, many reviewers demand a forward / backward variable selection based on significance (p-values) and NOT based on overall model performance, and it would be helpful to know whether these (or a substitute) is obtainable in RM.
Thanks for any ideas / suggestions!
Tagged:
0
