The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
XML / Doc format for User developed R fragments and documentation?
Contributor II
Does anyone have an idea on what the structure of R code fragments written by users should be in XML (noted under Tools -> Preferences -> R)? The parser is looking for them and is responsible I believe for causing the "Content is not allowed in prolog" error thrown by java when Mac OS X users load RM from a terminal. What about the format for documentation, is this the same format as the R standard for help files or something else?
Can this be 'turned off' in the loading process? RM appears to make this a critical part of the loading process.
Many thanks.
Can this be 'turned off' in the loading process? RM appears to make this a critical part of the loading process.
Many thanks.
Tagged:
0
Answers
as you can see it is just logged as a warning. There is nothing crucial about it. Your R Extension should work even without the R fragments - at least mine does.
Nevertheless some days ago we have removed the warning if no R fragments or documentation are available. With the next release you shouldn't see them anymore.
Best,
Nils
Actually mine flags as a fatal error, not a warning (see my post and crash dump on this) at:
http://rapid-i.com/rapidforum/index.php/topic,4912.msg18654.html#msg18654
However, what if one wants to write documentation files as part of a standard internal library? Does the documentation library which RM reads adhere to the R conventions for help file / documentation structure? What about the XML structure for the code fragments?
Many thanks!