The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
"[SOLVED][HELP]How to implement user-based performance criteria??"
Hi,
How to implement user-based performance criteria? For example, I would like the sensitivity to be as high as possible, if the false positive rate is not larger than 80%.
Or, I would like to the sum of (0.8*sensitivity+0.2*specificity) as my performance criterion.
Thanks a lot!!!
Xia
How to implement user-based performance criteria? For example, I would like the sensitivity to be as high as possible, if the false positive rate is not larger than 80%.
Or, I would like to the sum of (0.8*sensitivity+0.2*specificity) as my performance criterion.
Thanks a lot!!!
Xia
Tagged:
0
Answers
The "Extract Performance" operator may help
At the risk of shameless self promotion here is a process that uses it.
http://rapidminernotes.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/ClusterValidity
regards
Andrew
Best, Marius
The issue with "combine performances" is that the resulting output would not contain the "performanceVector", "parameterVector", and "kernel model (SVM). Is there any way to show them up in the "results" window or store them as a file somehow after the optimization process?
The following is the my process without the "combine performances" component:
Best,
Marius
However, under "PerformanceVector", it only shows weighted_performance as the following:
weighted_performance: 0.961 +/- 0.012 (mikro: 0.961). Is there any way to show the confusion matrix, or true positives vs predicted positives, true negatives vs. predicted negatives? That will be very helpful.
Thanks again for your kind help!
Best, Marius
This is great! Thanks so much for your kind help!
I have another silly question. It seems to me that the results are different between the situations where I chose/check "sensitivity" alone in the performance component, and where I chose/check "sensitivity" as the main criteria and also specificity and AUC in the performance component. Is there any places or documents that I could learn more clearly how the performance component works? Or if you could explain a little more?
Thanks a lot!
Xia
The performance should not change however. Can you please post a process where this is the case?
Best,
Marius
Sensitivity as the main criterion and the only criterion.
code:
Code:
But, the last time I run it, it give two different results. One with sensitivity larger than 95%, and the other ~83%.
Maybe, it is because I have updated the RapidMiner. ?
Anyway, thanks for helping with my problems!!! I really appreciate this software and your help!
Xia