<span style = "font-weight:800; font-size: 120%!important;">ALL FEATURE REQUESTS HERE ARE MONITORED BY OUR PRODUCT TEAM.
<U>VOTING MATTERS!</U>
IDEAS WITH HIGH NUMBERS OF VOTES (USUALLY ≥ 10) ARE PRIORITIZED IN OUR ROADMAP.<BR><BR>NOTE: IF YOU WISH TO SUGGEST A NEW FEATURE, PLEASE POST A NEW QUESTION AND TAG AS "FEATURE REQUEST". THANK YOU.</span>
<U>VOTING MATTERS!</U>
IDEAS WITH HIGH NUMBERS OF VOTES (USUALLY ≥ 10) ARE PRIORITIZED IN OUR ROADMAP.<BR><BR>NOTE: IF YOU WISH TO SUGGEST A NEW FEATURE, PLEASE POST A NEW QUESTION AND TAG AS "FEATURE REQUEST". THANK YOU.</span>
The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked <a href="https://web.altair.com/community-migration-contact-us">here</a>
Add weighted voting to Ensemble Vote meta-learner
Telcontar120
RapidMiner Certified Analyst, RapidMiner Certified Expert, Member Posts: 1,635 
Unicorn
The ensemble meta-learner Vote allows you to combine predictions from individual models, but it currently only provides simple majority voting for classification problems. For classification problems, it would be helpful to add a parameter to allow weighted voting (basically to average the confidences of the individual components rather than 0/1 voting by classification). This is similar to what is already supported in individual learners like k-nn for example. With only majority voting, the resulting classification confidences are very "lumpy" which is unfavorable for many reasons.
Tagged:
5
