The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here

How to remove NA?

707531707531 Member Posts: 4 Learner III
edited December 2018 in Help

Hi there,

Would you please help me.

I removed the value NA, so the number changed from 3000 to 0.

But the problems is that it still shows "NA".

How can I remove the "NA"? 

20180909_090710.jpg

20180909_090646.jpg

Because the "NA" is still there, so the decision tree shows like this : 

ddddd.jpg

 

Is there any way to completely remove this "NA"?

 

Thank you for your help in advance : )

Noh

 

Best Answers

  • kaymankayman Member Posts: 662 Unicorn
    Solution Accepted

    The 'remove unused attributes' should do the trick in this case.

     

     

  • tftemmetftemme Employee-RapidMiner, RapidMiner Certified Analyst, RapidMiner Certified Expert, RMResearcher, Member Posts: 164 RM Research
    Solution Accepted

    Hi @707531,

     

    The problem you are facing is that the mapping of your nominal attribute does not automatically remove the 'N/A' value. The operator which was meant by @kayman is 'Remove Unused Values', which will remove 'N/A' from the mapping of your attribute.

     

    Best regards,
    Fabian

Answers

  • 707531707531 Member Posts: 4 Learner III

    Hi kayman,

    Thank you for your help but would you kindly help me again?

    I couldn't find 'remove unused attributes' but I found 'Remove Useless Attributes'.

    I tried it, but the NA is still there...

    Would you please let me know how to use it to completely remove the NA?

     

    Thank you,

    Noh 

  • 707531707531 Member Posts: 4 Learner III

    How to remove class NA? help me please~

  • kaymankayman Member Posts: 662 Unicorn

    Yeah, I shouldn't try to name the operators out of my head...

     

    Now, in rare occasions I also noticed that using the operator on its own doesn't always lead to success, so what you could try is to combine it with an append operator.

     

    So first append, even if there is just one recordset. This kind of forces 'shadowsets' in the background to merge with the current set, and then use the 'Remove Unused Values' operator.

  • 707531707531 Member Posts: 4 Learner III

    Hi Fabian & Kayman,

    Oh, I get it, thanks a lot for your kind explanation  :smileyvery-happy:

    Have a nice day :smileyhappy:

     

    Thank you,

    Noh 

Sign In or Register to comment.