The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
Evaluation of Classification models
Muhammed_Fatih_
Member Posts: 93 Maven
Hello together,
is there a possibility within RapidMiner to parallelly train and test selected classification models and subsequently return the best performance result of the respective classification model? The goal of my research is to evaluate the behaviour of classification models with regard to the determination of the best performance.
Thank you for your answers!
Best regards,
Fatih
is there a possibility within RapidMiner to parallelly train and test selected classification models and subsequently return the best performance result of the respective classification model? The goal of my research is to evaluate the behaviour of classification models with regard to the determination of the best performance.
Thank you for your answers!
Best regards,
Fatih
Tagged:
0
Best Answer
-
sgenzer Administrator, Moderator, Employee-RapidMiner, RapidMiner Certified Analyst, Community Manager, Member, University Professor, PM Moderator Posts: 2,959 Community Manager7
Answers
thank you for your answer which was very helpful Is there also the possibility to execute ROC Comparison with Cross-Validation?
1. Inside AutoModel, by default, the model(s) is (are) not validated by a cross-validation, but by a multi - hold-out-set validation.
See the documentation on the "results" screen :
You can also inspect the generated process(es) after executing AutoModel to inspect them and understand exactly how is (are)
calculated the performance of the model(s).
2. If you want to obtain the comparaison of ROC curves with a cross-validation, you can use the Compare ROCs operator.
Simply put the models you want to benchmark inside this operator.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Lionel