The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
My honest testing performance is greater than training performance? is it luck or incorrect
I have used split operator on my data source in the ratio of 4:1 for training and honest testing I am using DT and cross-validation.
The performance result for testing is accuracy 93.21%, kappa 0.863 and for training accuracy 93.97%, kappa 0.695
I need to know whether the model is underfitting data and how should I conclude this result
The performance result for testing is accuracy 93.21%, kappa 0.863 and for training accuracy 93.97%, kappa 0.695
I need to know whether the model is underfitting data and how should I conclude this result
Tagged:
0
Best Answer
-
MartinLiebig Administrator, Moderator, Employee-RapidMiner, RapidMiner Certified Analyst, RapidMiner Certified Expert, University Professor Posts: 3,533 RM Data Scientistso a 2sigma effect. I would not worry.
- Sr. Director Data Solutions, Altair RapidMiner -
Dortmund, Germany5
Answers
Dortmund, Germany
it say +/- 0.31%
can you comment on the value of kappa that my model is producing. I'm curious to know why it is high for honest testing compared to training.
Thanks again
Dortmund, Germany