The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
Extending Rapidminer - Can I have an input port that doesn't "extend"?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cef44/cef448ba4cd8a306839c63b4bb3922f1989abdf0" alt="anaRodrigues"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f468/5f4680711dcf5b2bea70da8891109c95c08b4440" alt=""
in Help
Hi,
I'm building a super-operator that tests the volatility of the model in its subprocess to the train/test split. For this I need 1 input port that receives the example set, and 2 inner sinks that deliver to the subprocess a training set and a test set. The Idea is that the operator will iterate over a set of random seeds, and deliver different train/test splits.
In the super-operator tutorial you mention portPairExtender or portExtender. But what is the option if I don't want to extend the ports, but still pass data through to the subprocess?
Thanks,
Ana
I'm building a super-operator that tests the volatility of the model in its subprocess to the train/test split. For this I need 1 input port that receives the example set, and 2 inner sinks that deliver to the subprocess a training set and a test set. The Idea is that the operator will iterate over a set of random seeds, and deliver different train/test splits.
In the super-operator tutorial you mention portPairExtender or portExtender. But what is the option if I don't want to extend the ports, but still pass data through to the subprocess?
Thanks,
Ana
Tagged:
0