The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
Multi-label (Support Vector Clutering) cite BenHur/etal/2001a.
Contributor II
Dears,
Happy New Year.
One of great masterpiece
rapidminer.
When I have tested Support Vector Clustering operator in several ways, however, two-labeled clusters are always produced by rapidminer 5.0.
As you know, according to the BenHur's paper, there are multi-labeled results I've seen.
How can I make it? Is it possible with rapidminer 5.0 (community version)?
Kindly Regards,
Danny Seo.
Happy New Year.
One of great masterpiece
rapidminer.When I have tested Support Vector Clustering operator in several ways, however, two-labeled clusters are always produced by rapidminer 5.0.
As you know, according to the BenHur's paper, there are multi-labeled results I've seen.
How can I make it? Is it possible with rapidminer 5.0 (community version)?
Kindly Regards,
Danny Seo.
0
Answers
this should be possible, but it depends on your parameter settings. Perhaps you have to change some of the parameter values defining which clusters are outliers. Seems to me, that your operator only divides into noise and the rest...
Greetings,
Sebastian
Thanks for your reply.
Yes, you right. I had only cluster_1 and noise labels as a resut, although I was trying several parameter sets.
As my understanding Ben-Hur's SVC work, there are some parameters: C, q and p.
In RapidMiner, each parameter, C, q and p are related to convergence epsilon(KKT), kernel gamma and p respectively.
I hope that please give me any comments, expertises to improve SVC result.
Best Regards,
Danny.
BR.