The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
"Cluster model for classification?"
Hello,
after reading some papers about Support Vector Clustering I tought this method is perfect for my type of work, but now it doesn't look like it.
I want to classify data as "normal" or "anormal", but only have "normal" labeled data for training. The thing i tried to do was to generate an SVC-model which contains one single cluster of normal data. After calculation i wanted to apply the generated clustermodel on the testing data which also contains anormal sets. I thought the model will calculate the affiliation to the normal-cluster, but it seems I am wrong. Is there any way to do this in RapidMiner beneath one class svm's?
Thx,
Harald
after reading some papers about Support Vector Clustering I tought this method is perfect for my type of work, but now it doesn't look like it.
I want to classify data as "normal" or "anormal", but only have "normal" labeled data for training. The thing i tried to do was to generate an SVC-model which contains one single cluster of normal data. After calculation i wanted to apply the generated clustermodel on the testing data which also contains anormal sets. I thought the model will calculate the affiliation to the normal-cluster, but it seems I am wrong. Is there any way to do this in RapidMiner beneath one class svm's?
Thx,
Harald
Tagged:
0
Answers
at least there's no such ready to go method I'm currently aware of. You might use simply a distance threshold to the nearest neighbor, but this isn't exactly the same. I could think of extending the SV Clustering in this way or implementing something like a normal distribution kernel based method, but if this would work depends on your data. Seems to be a rather complex setting
Greetings,
Sebastian
thanks for the response!
It seems i have to look for other solutions of my problem.
I tried to use the libsvm's one-class in rapidminer-5.0-rc and there I have other problems (not shure if this is a bug).
When i use "Generate Data" to produce ExampleSets, the one-class libsvm fails with "numeric label not supported.". The same error is produced with other types of label. If I filter the label, it fails with "... does not have a label attribute.". In fact I wasn't able to get libsvm running for once. Do I have to do some XML tuning to prevent the label-madness or is there another way to train libsvm via rapidminer?
Greetings,
Harald