The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. In preparation for the migration, the Altair Community is on read-only mode from October 28 - November 6, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here
"Limit for columns of pivot table"
Hello there,
I'm really new to this program (RapidMiner 5.0.008) and I'm just using it privately.
I think there seems to be a problem with the pivot-operator.
If you use more than 83 columns, it looks like it allways returns just 1 column (Amount).
For some reason it doesn't do the thing for a column amount less than 84.
So is this just a limit?
If yes, why does there no error message or warning appear?
Is there any workaround for this limitation?
(If some of the sentence sound weird, its because english is not my native language)
Edit:
I just noticed that there seem to exist a bug-entry for that:
http://bugs.rapid-i.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245
Still wonder if there is a way around that problem.
Edit again (informations for the developers):
Alright ... i modified the source in eclipse to make that operator work in the way i need it.
Thats what i changed in the file "Example2AttributePivoting.java" as a temporary fix:
Modified this line:
(its weird cos this only happens for a column-amount/item-amount > 83
Not to mention that this line seems to check if the content of the Amount column changed.
Although my Amount column does not even change at <=83 - its allways "1")
I'm really new to this program (RapidMiner 5.0.008) and I'm just using it privately.
I think there seems to be a problem with the pivot-operator.
If you use more than 83 columns, it looks like it allways returns just 1 column (Amount).
For some reason it doesn't do the thing for a column amount less than 84.
So is this just a limit?
If yes, why does there no error message or warning appear?
Is there any workaround for this limitation?
Thanks for your answers.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<process version="5.0">
<context>
<input/>
<output/>
<macros/>
</context>
<operator activated="true" breakpoints="before" class="process" compatibility="5.0.0" expanded="true" name="Process">
<process expanded="true" height="391" width="915">
<operator activated="true" class="generate_transaction_data" compatibility="5.0.0" expanded="true" height="60" name="Generate Transaction Data" width="90" x="4" y="113">
<parameter key="number_transactions" value="100000"/>
<parameter key="number_customers" value="5000"/>
<parameter key="number_items" value="84"/>
<parameter key="number_clusters" value="1"/>
</operator>
<operator activated="true" class="pivot" compatibility="5.0.0" expanded="true" height="76" name="Pivot" width="90" x="179" y="210">
<parameter key="group_attribute" value="Id"/>
<parameter key="index_attribute" value="Item"/>
</operator>
<operator activated="true" class="replace_missing_values" compatibility="5.0.0" expanded="true" height="94" name="Replace Missing Values" width="90" x="246" y="75">
<parameter key="default" value="zero"/>
<list key="columns"/>
</operator>
<operator activated="true" class="numerical_to_binominal" compatibility="5.0.0" expanded="true" height="76" name="Numerical to Binominal" width="90" x="380" y="75"/>
<operator activated="true" class="fp_growth" compatibility="5.0.0" expanded="true" height="76" name="FP-Growth" width="90" x="447" y="210"/>
<operator activated="true" class="create_association_rules" compatibility="5.0.0" expanded="true" height="60" name="Create Association Rules" width="90" x="581" y="210">
<parameter key="min_confidence" value="0.1"/>
</operator>
<connect from_op="Generate Transaction Data" from_port="output" to_op="Pivot" to_port="example set input"/>
<connect from_op="Pivot" from_port="example set output" to_op="Replace Missing Values" to_port="example set input"/>
<connect from_op="Replace Missing Values" from_port="example set output" to_op="Numerical to Binominal" to_port="example set input"/>
<connect from_op="Numerical to Binominal" from_port="example set output" to_op="FP-Growth" to_port="example set"/>
<connect from_op="Numerical to Binominal" from_port="original" to_port="result 2"/>
<connect from_op="FP-Growth" from_port="frequent sets" to_op="Create Association Rules" to_port="item sets"/>
<connect from_op="Create Association Rules" from_port="rules" to_port="result 1"/>
<portSpacing port="source_input 1" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_result 1" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_result 2" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_result 3" spacing="0"/>
</process>
</operator>
</process>
(If some of the sentence sound weird, its because english is not my native language)
Edit:
I just noticed that there seem to exist a bug-entry for that:
http://bugs.rapid-i.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245
Still wonder if there is a way around that problem.
Edit again (informations for the developers):
Alright ... i modified the source in eclipse to make that operator work in the way i need it.
Thats what i changed in the file "Example2AttributePivoting.java" as a temporary fix:
Modified this line:
into that:
constantAttributeValues = true;
I know that this line was there for a reason ... but when i tried to debug it i found out that somehow the condition at:
constantAttributeValues = false;
never gets fired for i=1 (column at i=1 should be my Amount-attribute).
if (lastExample.getValue(attribute) != example.getValue(attribute)) {
constantAttributeValues = false;
continue;
}
(its weird cos this only happens for a column-amount/item-amount > 83
Not to mention that this line seems to check if the content of the Amount column changed.
Although my Amount column does not even change at <=83 - its allways "1")
Tagged:
0
Answers
thank you for your investigations regarding this bug. I will attach a link to this thread on the respective bug.
Greetings,
Sebastian
we now have a parameter to switch pivoting for constant columns on and off.
Cheers,
Simon